Page 2 of 2

Re: 16 team 8x8 H2H

Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 12:56 pm
by Grey
The first would not be too little, the 2nd would be too much.

Re: 16 team 8x8 H2H

Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 1:09 pm
by marcheese
Would the first offer (Nolasco and Peralta for Weaver and Zimmerman) be a good fit for my team? Or am I better with what I have?

Re: 16 team 8x8 H2H

Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 1:45 pm
by Grey
I'd want Zimmerman.

Re: 16 team 8x8 H2H

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 8:44 am
by marcheese
Through the first 2 weeks, I'm low on AVG, R, and H as you predicted I would be. I'm thinking of targeting Cano.

So the initial offer would be Phillips for Cano, but I'd have to sweeten the deal for him a bit.

I can't think of what else to offer that could make this trade worth it for him. Here is his roster...

Doumit, Clement, Fielder, Cano, DeWitt, Furcal, Teahen, Kendrick, Guillen, G Sizemore, Hamilton, D Young, Rowand, Iwamura, Carpenter, Kershaw, Burnett, Pettitte, Saunders, Bell, Madson, Saito, and Durbin.

Does anything stand out that would make this a good/fair deal for me? Thanks.

Re: 16 team 8x8 H2H

Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:12 am
by Grey
Phillips and a closer?

Re: 16 team 8x8 H2H

Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:32 am
by marcheese
That may work...

So Phillips/Dotel for Cano/Madson?

or

What if I tried Phillips/Snyder for Cano/Clement?

Do you like both deals for my team?